学术论文读后感格式
文件夹
当看完一部影视作品后,相信大家的视野一定开拓了不少吧,是时候静下心来好好写写读后感了。读后感书写有哪些格式要求呢?怎样才能写一篇优秀的读后感呢?接下来我就给大家介绍一些优秀的读后感范文,我们一起来看一看吧,希望对大家有所帮助。
the novel marks the beginning of realism. andré gide said that the red and the black was a novel ahead of its time, that it was a novel for readers in the twentieth century. in stendhal’s time, prose novels included dialogue and omniscient narrator descriptions; his great contribution to literary technique was describing the psychologies (feelings, thoughts, inner monologues) of the characters, resultantly he is considered the creator of the psychological novel.
the paper"s opening sentence:if your characters do not talk about politics, they are not the french in 1830. is the famous sentence in the red and the black. the material of the red and the black is based on a realistic event that a tutor killed her hostess in 1827. when stendhal read the story in the newspaper, he adapted it and wrote the long bildungsroman novel the red and the black. the work, previously titled julien, then, changed into the red and the black. the red symbolizes many things, the uniform of the napoleon era, mrs. renal’s blood, revolution and contribution by the common people. the black also stands for robes of priests, martel’s mourning apparel and the plot of church. the subtitle, a chronicle of the 19th century, definitely states the time background. thus it can be seen, stendhal consciously wrote this political tint novel about society of bourbon restoration. the red and the black is the first critical realism novel in europe.
the red and the black includes two volumes. it mainly tells the story of julien sorel’s life in a monarchic society of fixed social clue of this book is about julien sorel’s life experience. from the venal town to the capital paris, the ghastly seminary to the royalist, love and religious activities to the secret political conferences, the red and the black describes a picture of the society under control of charles x of france.
book i julien sorel is an ambitious son of a carpenter in the verrières village, in franche-comté, france, who would rather read and daydream about the glory days of napoleon"s long-disbanded army. in the event, julien sorel becomes an acolyte. later, the local catholic prelate secures him a post as the tutor for the children of monsieur de rênal, the mayor of verrières. he falls in love with monsieur de rênal’s wife; it ends badly when exposed to the village, by her chambermaid, elisa. then, julien goes to a seminary in besan?on, which he finds intellectually stifling and pervaded with social cliques. disgusted by the church’s political machinations, julien recommends himself as private secretary to the diplomat marquis de la mole, a roman catholic legitimist.
book ii chronicles the time leading to the july revolution of 1830, and julien sorel’s parisian life, as an employee of the de la mole family. despite moving among high society, the family and their friends, condescend to julien for being an uncouth plebeian his intellectual talents notwithstanding. in his boundlessly ambitious rise in the world, julien perceives the materialism and hypocrisy important to the elite of parisian society, and that the counter-revolutionary temper of the time renders it impossible for well-born men of superior intellect and esthetic sensibility to progressively participate in the public affairs of the nation with any success. meanwhile, in the preceding months, the marquis’s bored daughter, mathilde de la mole, had become emotionally torn, between her romantic attraction to julien, for his admirable personal and intellectual qualities, and her social repugnance at becoming sexually intimate with a lower-class man. at first, he finds her unattractive, but his interest is piqued, by her attentions and the admiration she inspires in others; twice, she seduces and rejects him, leaving him in a miasma of despair, self-doubt, and happiness. only during his secret mission does he gain the key to winning her affections. consequently, mathilde sincerely falls in love with julien, eventually revealing to him that she carries his child; yet, whilst he was on diplomatic mission in england, she became officially engaged to monsieur de croisenois, an amiable, rich young man, heir to a duchy.
although the red and the black was written in the 19th century, the novel is still of reflective value to our real the modern society, we still can find out many juliens。 they are young and talented, but low birth. at first, they despise the unfair treatment in the society. they hate corruption of officialdom. they disdain the person who has special power and privileges. however, they always long for joining in the officialdom. the iron hand of cruel necessity broke those juliens’ wills. once into the officialdom, they gradually lose themselves. finally, they even enjoy in it and try to defend themselves.
in fact, they must end of failure like julien, i think, against their wills, following the wrong mind and taking advantage of the empressement of others. learning of julien’s romantic liaison with mathilde, the marquis de la mole is angered, but relents before her determination, and his affection for him, and bestows upon julien an income-producing property attached to an aristocratic title, and a military commission in the army. although ready to bless their marriage, he changes his mind upon receiving the reply to a character-reference-letter he wrote to the abbé chénal, julien’s previous employer in the village of verrières; however, the reply letter, written by madame de rênal at the urging of her confessor priest warns the marquis that julien sorel is a social-climbing cad who preys upon emotionally vulnerable women. on learning the marquis’s disapproval of the marriage, julien sorel travels to his home village of verrières and shoots madame de rênal during mass in the village church; she survives. despite the efforts of mathilde, madame de rênal, and the priests devoted to him since his early life, julien sorel is determined to die because the materialist society of bourbon restoration france will not accommodate a low-born man of superior intellect and aesthetic sensibility possessing neither money nor social connections.
reading between the lines, we can find that julien is a b-willed and cunning young man who is determined to make his way to the upper society. julien’s mistrustfulness and his touchy pride were through his life. he reached such heights of perfection in this kind of eloquence, which has replaced the swiftness of action found under the empire. julien forgot his dreary role as a rebellious plebeian. when he was in the prison, he awakened and said: the whole world and the society are hypocritical! he yelled out: i love truth, but where is truth? everyone is hypocritical and trickish, including the great people! he refused to appeal. later, he was sent to the block and ended his life.
julien is a tragical character in this novel. he represents the young people of petty bourgeoisie in the bourbon restoration. they are young and talented, but low birth. finally, they end of death. as the novel shown, the society under control of charles x of france was dark. there was no middle way for them. the connection between people was only money, even between father and son. when julien was in the prison, his father visited him. at the beginning, his father scolded him. he thought that julien was a shame of his family. while father heard of the money julien had, father changed his attitude at once. you had money, people respected you; without money, people looked down upon you. in that society, without money, you were nothing! julien was the victim of cash nexus. i cannot help saying: it is an eat-man world! if julien lives in the modern society, without repress and exploitation of class, i believe, he must be appreciated by others and become a successful person.
julien sorel is practical, greedy, and cruel. in order to realize his aim and get rid of poverty, julien took advantage of mathilde by hook or by crook. he believed that the end justifies the means. it is true that every one should try his best to achieve what he is pursuing. but we should do it in a proper and moral way. and whatever we do, we shouldn"t forget that love and honesty should remain the most cherishable elements in our life.
today we are living in a harmonious society; we should keep our purity and humanity. fame and fortune are important, but they are not everything. love and honesty are of more importance for a peaceful life. we should trust each other, help each other, and take care of each other.
although julien ended of death, we still have many things to learn from him. he was low birth, but he always encouraged himself that: i will be great! he never gave up. when we encounter some problems, we should try to solve them instead of giving up. plus, before julien started a thing, he always had made a plan. everything must be carefully planned before we act, then twice as much can be accomplished with half the effort.
in a whole, success and opportunity are only given to those people who are well-prepared. i am ready at all times. are you ready?
created in 1600 —— 1601 hamlet had been admired for centuries. is to at the moment, still feel his vocal. and all this is not the plot, also not only only is excellent literary technique, it is reflected by the problem. in general,
it describes a kind of extremely primitive, people.
the hero hamlet first dealing with your original ideal world. at the start of the benefits in some hamlet "childhood", he did you experience any huge setback, living environment is more simple, always learning western orthodoxy. but in the end, noble, to adore the father died, less than a month is virtuous mother remarried his uncle to usurp the throne. this made him wonder in the world. and after this doubt directly contributed to his hesitation. he realized that they are not perfect it, chastity but desire, moral victory over greed. he thinks you should go to revenge, but the moral person is his mother; his uncle killed his father and he is a person, is a persons thoughts. but even if revenge success, again how? he said: "to be or not to be, this is a question worth thinking about" life is a pain, but the fear of death and have less absolute. he met a problem, cant answer is unavoidable.
hamlets situation is not the only, the life of big hands to hold each one is so tight.(.)
the old kings death, which are not related and queen. but as a woman she faces two kinds of selection, it is moral or desire. she chose the latter. however she scorned by the hamlet and criticism, moral emptiness has brought her considerable pain, in fact, the queen is a kind person, she is not morally repugnant. she is to choose what kind of misfortune, not in the selection of your own destiny.
the new king, the uncle usurped the throne, he is the biggest villain in the play leading role. he wanted to the throne, and to the queen with desire. but the king was others. is his brother, he dont deserve the throne. he, like all of the faces the loss of the ideal world in my heart. but he strenuously to win, but at the moment, he was a hero general spirit, he bravely to fight for originally do not belong to own. but it is also the tragedy. he paid the price, his hands stained with the blood of others, cannot repent. in later, he found hamlet after knowing the truth, he began to save themselves may lose the happiness of life. he hovered between sin and rational, in the end he didnt jump out, died in his own sword.
we remember her goodness: for someone who lost arms and blinded in eyes, for someone who despised her for her ordinariness, and even for someone who had hurt her deeply in the past.
we remember her pursuit of justice. it’s like a companion with the goodness. but still, a virtuous person should promote the goodness on one side and must check the badness on the other side.
we remember her self-respect and the clear situation on equality. in her opinion, everyone is the same at the god’s feet. though there are differences in status、in property and also in appearance, but all the human being are equal in personality.
we also remember her striving for life, her toughness and her confidence…
when we think of this girl, what she gave us was not a pretty face or a transcendent temperament that make us admire deeply, but a huge charm of her personality.
actually, she wasn’t pretty, and of course, the ordinary appearance didn’t make others feel good of her, even her own aunt felt disgusted with it. and some others even thought that she was easy to look down on and to tease, so when miss ingram met jane eyre, she seemed quite contemptuous, for that she was obviously much more prettier than ‘the plain and ugly governess’. but as the little governess had said: ‘do you think, because i am poor, obscure, plain, and little, i am soulless and heartless? you think wrong!’ this is the idea of equality in jane eyre’s mind. god hadn’t given her beauty and wealth, but instead, god gave her a kind mind and a thinking brain. her idea of equality and self-respect impress us so much and let us feel the power inside her body.
in my mind, though a person’s beauty on the face can make others once feel that one is attractive and charming, if his or her mind isn’t the same beautiful as the appearance, such as beauty cannot last for, when others find that the beauty which had charmed them was only a falsity, it’s not true, they will like the person no more. for a long time, only a person’s great virtue, a noble soul, a beautiful heart can be called as an everlasting beauty, just as kahill gibran has said, that ‘beauty is a heart enflamed and a soul enchanted’. i can feel that how beauty really is, as we are all fleshly men, so we can’t distinguish whether a man is of nobleness or humbleness, but fleshly men, so we can’t distinguish whether a man is of nobleness or humbleness, but as there are great differences in our souls, and from that, we can know that whether a man is noble or ordinary, and even obscure, that is, whether he is beautiful or not.
jane eyre — a beautiful soul jane eyre, is a poor but aspiring, small in body but huge in soul, obscure but self-respecting girl. after we close the covers of the book, after having a long journey of the spirit, jane eyre, a marvelous figure, has left us so much to recall and to think:
we remember her goodness: for someone who lost arms and blinded in eyes, for someone who despised her for her ordinariness, and even for someone who had hurt her deeply in the past.
we remember her pursuit of justice. it’s like a companion with the goodness. but still, a virtuous person should promote the goodness on one side and must check the badness on the other side.
we remember her self-respect and the clear situation on equality. in her opinion, everyone is the same at the god’s feet. though there are differences in status、in property and also in appearance, but all the human being are equal in personality.
we also remember her striving for life, her toughness and her confidence…
when we think of this girl, what she gave us was not a pretty face or a transcendent temperament that make us admire deeply, but a huge charm of her personality.
actually, she wasn’t pretty, and of course, the ordinary appearance didn’t make others feel good of her, even her own aunt felt disgusted with it. and some others even thought that she was easy to look down on and to tease, so when miss ingram met jane eyre, she seemed quite contemptuous, for that she was obviously much more prettier than ‘the plain and ugly governess’. but as the little governess had said: ‘do you think, because i am poor, obscure, plain, and little, i am soulless and heartless? you think wrong!’ this is the idea of equality in jane eyre’s mind. god hadn’t given her beauty and wealth, but instead, god gave her a kind mind and a thinking brain. her idea of equality and self-respect impress us so much and let us feel the power inside her body.
in my mind, though a person’s beauty on the face can make others once feel that one is attractive and charming, if his or her mind isn’t the same beautiful as the appearance, such as beauty cannot last for, when others find that the beauty which had charmed them was only a falsity, it’s not true, they will like the person no more. for a long time, only a person’s great virtue, a noble soul, a beautiful heart can be called as an everlasting beauty, just as kahill gibran has said, that ‘beauty is a heart enflamed and a soul enchanted’. i can feel that how beauty really is, as we are all fleshly men, so we can’t distinguish whether a man is of nobleness or humbleness, but fleshly men, so we can’t distinguish whether a man is of nobleness or humbleness, but as there are great differences in our souls, and from that, we can know that whether a man is noble or ordinary, and even obscure, that is, whether he is beautiful or not.
2025年学术论文读后感格式(四篇)
文件夹